Search This Blog

четверг, 30 мая 2019 г.

10 Things Einstein Got Right

One

hundred years ago, on May 29, 1919, astronomers observed a total solar eclipse in

an ambitious  effort to test Albert

Einstein’s general theory of relativity by seeing it in action. Essentially, Einstein

thought space and time were intertwined in an infinite “fabric,” like an

outstretched blanket. A massive object such as the Sun bends the spacetime blanket

with its gravity, such that light no longer travels in a straight line as it passes

by the Sun.


This

means the apparent positions of background stars seen close to the Sun in the

sky – including during a solar eclipse – should seem slightly shifted in the

absence of the Sun, because the Sun’s gravity bends light. But until the

eclipse experiment, no one was able to test Einstein’s theory of general

relativity, as no one could see stars near the Sun in the daytime otherwise.


The

world celebrated the results of this eclipse experiment— a victory for

Einstein, and the dawning of a new era of our understanding of the universe.


General

relativity has many important consequences for what we see in the cosmos and

how we make discoveries in deep space today. The same is true for Einstein’s slightly

older theory, special relativity, with its widely celebrated equation E=mc². Here

are 10 things that result from Einstein’s theories of relativity:


image

1. Universal Speed Limit


Einstein’s

famous equation E=mc² contains “c,” the speed of light in a vacuum. Although

light comes in many flavors – from the rainbow of colors humans can see to the

radio waves that transmit spacecraft data – Einstein said all light must obey

the speed limit of 186,000 miles (300,000 kilometers) per second. So, even if

two particles of light carry very different amounts of energy, they will travel

at the same speed.


This

has been shown experimentally in space. In 2009, our Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope detected two photons at virtually the same moment, with one carrying a million

times more energy than the other. They both came from a high-energy region near

the collision of two neutron stars about 7 billion years ago. A neutron star is

the highly dense remnant of a star that has exploded. While other theories

posited that space-time itself has a “foamy” texture that might slow down more energetic

particles, Fermi’s observations found in favor of Einstein.


image

2. Strong Lensing


Just

like the Sun bends the light from distant stars that pass close to it, a

massive object like a galaxy distorts the light from another object that is

much farther away. In some cases, this phenomenon can actually help us unveil

new galaxies. We say that the closer object acts like a “lens,” acting like a

telescope that reveals the more distant object. Entire clusters of galaxies can

be lensed and act as lenses, too.


When

the lensing object appears close enough to the more distant object in the sky,

we actually see multiple images of that faraway object. In 1979, scientists

first observed a double image of a quasar, a very bright object at the center

of a galaxy that involves a supermassive black hole feeding off a disk of

inflowing gas. These apparent copies of the distant object change in brightness

if the original object is changing, but not all at once, because of how space

itself is bent by the foreground object’s gravity.


Sometimes,

when a distant celestial object is precisely aligned with another object, we

see light bent into an “Einstein ring” or arc. In this image from our Hubble Space

Telescope
,

the sweeping arc of light represents a distant galaxy that has been lensed,

forming a “smiley face” with other galaxies.


image

3. Weak Lensing


When

a massive object acts as a lens for a farther object, but the objects are not specially

aligned with respect to our view, only one image of the distant object is

projected. This happens much more often. The closer object’s gravity makes the

background object look larger and more stretched than it really is. This is

called “weak lensing.”


Weak

lensing is very important for studying some of the biggest mysteries of the

universe: dark matter and dark energy. Dark matter is an invisible material

that only interacts with regular matter through gravity, and holds together

entire galaxies and groups of galaxies like a cosmic glue. Dark energy behaves like

the opposite of gravity, making objects recede from each other. Three upcoming

observatories – Our Wide Field Infrared

Survey Telescope
,

WFIRST, mission, the European-led Euclid space mission with NASA participation,

and the ground-based Large Synoptic Survey Telescope

— will be key players in this effort. By surveying distortions of weakly lensed

galaxies across the universe, scientists can characterize the effects of these persistently

puzzling phenomena.


Gravitational

lensing in general will also enable NASA’s James Webb Space telescope to look

for some of the very first stars and galaxies of the universe.


image

4. Microlensing


So

far, we’ve been talking about giant objects acting like magnifying lenses for

other giant objects. But stars can also “lens” other stars, including stars

that have planets around them. When light from a background star gets “lensed”

by a closer star in the foreground, there is an increase in the background

star’s brightness. If that foreground star also has a planet orbiting it, then

telescopes can detect an extra bump in the background star’s light, caused by

the orbiting planet. This technique for finding exoplanets, which are planets

around stars other than our own, is called “microlensing.”


Our Spitzer Space Telescope, in collaboration with ground-based

observatories, found an “iceball” planet through microlensing. While

microlensing has so far found less than 100 confirmed planets,  WFIRST could find more than 1,000 new

exoplanets using this technique.


image

5. Black Holes


The

very existence of black holes, extremely dense objects from which no light can escape, is a prediction

of general relativity. They represent the most extreme distortions of the

fabric of space-time, and are especially famous for how their immense gravity affects

light in weird ways that only Einstein’s theory could explain.


In

2019 the Event Horizon Telescope international collaboration, supported by the

National Science Foundation and other partners, unveiled the first image of a black hole’s event

horizon
,

the border that defines a black hole’s “point of no return” for nearby

material. NASA’s Chandra

X-ray Observatory
, Nuclear

Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR)
,

Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory, and Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope all looked

at the same black hole in a coordinated effort, and researchers are still

analyzing the results.


image

6. Relativistic Jets


This

Spitzer image shows the galaxy Messier 87 (M87) in infrared light, which has a

supermassive black hole at its center. Around the black hole is a disk of

extremely hot gas, as well as two jets of material shooting out in opposite

directions. One of the jets, visible on the right of the image, is pointing

almost exactly toward Earth. Its enhanced brightness is due to the emission of light

from particles traveling toward the observer at near the speed of light, an

effect called “relativistic beaming.” By contrast, the other jet is invisible

at all wavelengths because it is traveling away from the observer near the

speed of light. The details of how such jets work are still mysterious, and

scientists will continue studying black holes for more clues. 


image

7. A Gravitational Vortex


Speaking

of black holes, their gravity is so intense that they make infalling material

“wobble” around them. Like a spoon stirring honey, where honey is the space

around a black hole, the black hole’s distortion of space has a wobbling effect

on material orbiting the black hole. Until recently, this was only theoretical.

But in 2016, an international team of scientists using European Space Agency’s XMM-Newton and our Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NUSTAR) announced they had observed the signature of wobbling

matter for the first time. Scientists will continue studying these odd effects

of black holes to further probe Einstein’s ideas firsthand.


Incidentally,

this wobbling of material around a black hole is similar to how Einstein

explained Mercury’s odd orbit. As the closest planet to the Sun, Mercury feels

the most gravitational tug from the Sun, and so its orbit’s orientation is

slowly rotating around the Sun, creating a wobble.


image

 8. Gravitational Waves


Ripples

through space-time called gravitational waves were hypothesized by Einstein

about 100 years ago, but not actually observed until recently. In 2016, an

international collaboration of astronomers working with the Laser Interferometer

Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO)


detectors announced a landmark discovery: This enormous experiment detected the

subtle signal of gravitational waves that had been traveling for 1.3 billion

years after two black holes merged in a cataclysmic event. This opened a brand

new door in an area of science called multi-messenger astronomy, in which both

gravitational waves and light can be studied.


For example,

our telescopes collaborated to measure light from two neutron stars

merging after LIGO detected gravitational wave signals from the event, as

announced in 2017. Given that gravitational waves from this event were detected

mere 1.7 seconds before gamma rays from the merger, after both traveled 140

million light-years, scientists concluded Einstein was right about something

else: gravitational waves and light waves travel at the same speed.


image

9. The Sun Delaying Radio Signals


Planetary

exploration spacecraft have also shown Einstein to be right about general

relativity. Because spacecraft communicate with Earth using light, in the form

of radio waves, they present great opportunities to see whether the gravity of

a massive object like the Sun changes light’s path.  


In

1970, our Jet Propulsion Laboratory announced that Mariner VI and VII,

which completed flybys of Mars in 1969, had conducted experiments using radio

signals — and also agreed with Einstein. Using NASA’s

Deep Space Network (DSN)
, the two Mariners took several hundred radio measurements for

this purpose. Researchers measured the time it took for radio signals to travel

from the DSN dish in Goldstone, California, to the spacecraft and back. As

Einstein would have predicted, there was a delay in the total roundtrip time

because of the Sun’s gravity. For Mariner VI, the maximum delay was 204

microseconds, which, while far less than a single second, aligned almost

exactly with what Einstein’s theory would anticipate.


In

1979, the Viking landers performed an even more accurate experiment along these

lines. Then, in 2003 a group of scientists used NASA’s Cassini Spacecraft to repeat these kinds of

radio science experiments with 50 times greater precision than Viking. It’s

clear that Einstein’s theory has held up! 


image

10. Proof from Orbiting

Earth


In

2004, we launched a spacecraft called Gravity

Probe B


specifically designed to watch Einstein’s theory play out in the orbit of

Earth. The theory goes that Earth, a rotating body, should be pulling the

fabric of space-time around it as it spins, in addition to distorting light with

its gravity.


The

spacecraft had four gyroscopes and pointed at the star IM Pegasi while orbiting

Earth over the poles. In this experiment, if Einstein had been wrong, these

gyroscopes would have always pointed in the same direction. But in 2011,

scientists announced they had observed tiny changes in the gyroscopes’

directions as a consequence of Earth, because of its gravity, dragging space-time

around it.


image

BONUS: Your GPS! Speaking of time delays, the

GPS (global positioning system) on your phone or in your car relies on Einstein’s

theories for accuracy. In order to know where you are, you need a receiver –

like your phone, a ground station and a network of satellites orbiting Earth to

send and receive signals. But according to general relativity, because of

Earth’s gravity curving spacetime, satellites experience time moving slightly

faster than on Earth. At the same time, special relativity would say time moves

slower for objects that move much faster than others.


When

scientists worked out the net effect of these forces, they found that the

satellites’ clocks would always be a tiny bit ahead of clocks on Earth. While

the difference per day is a matter of millionths of a second, that change

really adds up. If GPS didn’t have relativity built into its technology, your

phone would guide you miles out of your way!



Make sure to follow us on Tumblr for your regular dose of space: http://nasa.tumblr.com.


Комментариев нет:

Popular last month